ABSTRACTS No. 48 - Page 196


Mohammad Ihsanifar Langaroodi

Domain of Authenticity of Exegetical Hadiths

The main points of the present paper are as follows: 1. every exegetical statement requires conclusive evidence or reliable evidence based on irrefutable one; 2. hadiths possessing common-sense evidence and rationally reliable hadiths which are utilized as evidence both practically and exegetically; 3. unreliable hadiths are used as evidence only for practical aspects of the Holy Quran's verses; 4. although both groups of hadiths should be accepted as reliable by religious law but the secret of this classification is found on three points: a) defining tafsir and its real nature, b) existence of indication for real evidence in rationally reliable hadiths, c) lack of the criteria for such an indication in obligatory developed hadith; 6. classification of statements into scientific and practical is not acceptable regarding the authenticity of rational hadiths but reliability of their issuance is subject to their importance and significance; 7. studying the advantages of unreliable exegetical hadiths; 8. incompatibility of exegetical haiths with the holy Quran and sunna.
Key Words: Authenticity of Exegetical Hadiths, Principles of Authenticity of Hadiths, Domain of Authenticity of Exegetical Hadiths, Rational and Reliable Hadiths, Development of Sunna with mere Obedience, Advantages of Weak Hadiths, Incompatibility of Exegetical Hadiths with the Quran and Sunna.

Sayyid Mohammad Baqir Hojjati Ph.D.

Authenticity of Human Knowledge and Its Role in Comprehension of Hadith from Allama Sha`rani's Point of View

Majid Maaref Ph.D.
Allama Sha`rani is one of those scholars who have dealt with hadith comprehension and criticism with a background of rational and transmitional

Page From 199